RI lawmaker files immigration bill that follows Arizona’s law

“RI lawmaker files immigration bill that follows Arizona’s law” by Karen Ziner, Providence Journal (May 19, 2010)

“Other states taking cue from Arizona law: Legislators call feds ‘AWOL’ on ‘invaders’” by Chuck Neubauer, Washington Times (May 10, 2010)

RI lawmaker files immigration bill that follows Arizona’s law

By Karen Ziner

Providence Journal (May 19, 2010)

PROVIDENCE, R.I. — State Rep. Peter Palumbo, D-District 16, Cranston, has filed a bill that largely copies a controversial Arizona law considered the toughest immigration legislation in the country.

Palumbo’s bill, like the Arizona law, makes failure to carry alien registration cards a state crime, and requires police to question people “where reasonable suspicion exists” that the person is unlawfully in the United States.

The bill, H 8142, filed Tuesday, also targets people who hire illegal immigrants, or who knowingly transport them.

Much of Palumbo’s bill is taken verbatim from the Arizona bill, SB 1070, which was signed into law by Governor Jan Brewer last month, over President Obama’s objections.

Palumbo could not be reached for comment Wednesday morning.

Brewer’s signing of the Arizona law set off protests around the country, and prompted the filing of a number of constitutional challenges and lawsuits, and attempts to boycott Arizona businesses.

The latest challenge, a federal class-action suit, was filed Monday by the American Civil Liberties Union and other civil rights organizations.

Steven Brown, executive director of the Rhode Island affiliate of the ACLU, called Palumbo’s bill “nothing less than a deliberate recipe for increased racial profiling in the state. It purports to give police this magical bloodhound quality of being able to sniff out any individual who is in the country illegally. How a police officer otherwise is able to adopt this reasonable suspicion that somebody is here illegally is beyond me.”

Brown added, “I don’t think there’s going to be a lot of support for this. I think Rhode Islanders on the whole are much more cognizant of the incredibly divisive and mean-spirited nature of a bill like this.”

Terry Gorman, head of Rhode Islanders for Immigration Law Enforcement (RIILE), said he and his organization plan to support Palumbo’s effort.

“It’s incredibly important that we have laws like the Arizona law if we’re ever going to do anything about illegal immigration,” Gorman said. “The situation is never going to be resolved unless measures are taken.”

AZ debate shows low profile of Latino leadership

This article was circulated by the National Institute Latino Policy (NILP)

By JESSE WASHINGTON

Associated Press (May 7, 2010)

Quick: Name a leader of the national Hispanic community.

That’s not easy for some Hispanics, let alone other Americans. Even as the Arizona immigration debate has highlighted concerns of the nation’s more than 40 million Latino citizens, it has revealed a lack of name-brand recognition for those dedicated to serving America’s largest minority group.

This relative obscurity is largely due to the diversity of Latinos, who come from many countries and cultures with unique concerns that are not easily lumped together – but often are.

“When you’re in Colombia, you’re a Colombian. When you’re in Puerto Rico, you’re a Puerto Rican. When you’re in the U.S., you’re a Latino or Hispanic,” said Eric Cortes, a Philadelphia resident and member of a local leadership institute that trains people to work in the Latino community.

Cortes could not recall the names of any leaders of national Latino organizations, but he knew many locally based activists.

“I feel like every state or region has that person doing national campaigns for rights. … It’s hard to pinpoint one person,” he said.

There are, in fact, many Latino leaders with national impact. Yet in the Arizona debate they have been overshadowed by the Rev. Al Sharpton, who led a march in Phoenix on Wednesday, debated pro-immigration sheriff Joe Arpaio on television and made numerous other appearances and statements.

Several Latino leaders said it’s better to have multiple leaders and groups who can focus on different areas.

“The political sector, the civil rights sector, the business sector, small business, immigrants’ rights, organized labor,” said Thomas Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund. “I don’t know if this is a community that can or ought to depend on a single or very small group of leaders.”

MALDEF was founded in 1968 to focus on legal activism. It was born from the League of United Latin American Citizens, or LULAC, the nation’s oldest Latino rights group, which was founded in 1929.

Another major organization is the National Council of La Raza, known as NCLR. On Thursday, it gathered seven other organizations at its headquarters to call for a national boycott of Arizona over the new law requiring police to question people’s immigration status, which many Latinos say encourages racial profiling.

“I worry less about emerging as a singular leader than thinking about what work can I do in the community,” said Janet Murguia, NCLR’s president and CEO. “When you’re in a movement to create change, you don’t do that without leaders across the board.”

Hispanic organizations have helped millions of citizens – desegregating schools and other public places, helping create the Head Start program, pushing for the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. Yet people like Murguia, Saenz and Brent Wilkes, LULAC’s national executive director, remain unknown to many.

Wilkes sees several reasons. “The African-American civil rights movement, because of slavery, was more dramatic. While there are parallels to some issues, Latinos didn’t face perhaps the same level of discrimination.”

Also, Wilkes said, “The culture is different. Latinos are less likely to rally around the one individual. Latinos who get involved prefer to create their own thing, and not necessarily fall in line behind one person.”

“I also think that a lot of this is a media-driven phenomenon,” he said. “If you’re not in the media, I think you get left out of the public consciousness.”

Most civil rights leaders came out of the black church, which has a tradition of public performance and showmanship that continues to draw media attention. The Revs. Jesse Jackson and Sharpton both mastered the art of attracting cameras, which combined with their activism made them famous, although not embraced as leaders by all blacks.

Today, the issue of equality in America is largely seen in a black-and-white framework, while Latino issues are not covered as much. Aside from immigration, it has been years since a Hispanic issue penetrated the national discourse, like Cesar Chavez’s farm union work starting in the 1960s or California’s Proposition 187 effort in 1994 to prevent non-citizens from receiving social services.

“The Latino community does not lack for leaders,” said O. Ricardo Pimentel, president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists and the editorial page editor at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. “It’s as rich in leaders as any other community. But the exposure those leaders get is different. It’s a function of where the cameras are pointing.”

This dynamic could be changing as the looming immigration reform battle gives Latino leaders a new platform and a galvanizing issue to unite people of all backgrounds.

NCLR’s Murguia said her group is trying to garner more media coverage, and that the Arizona law “becomes an opportunity to get a clear message out.”

“You’re not wishing for disaster so you can find the opportunity,” she said. “But we will seize this situation to act in the best interests of our community. I hope that we will be able to leverage media more as we reinforce the impact of this law and the message that we want to convey.”

Jesse Washington covers race and ethnicity for The Associated Press.

Happy Cinco de Boycott!

Thought we share this with our readers:

By Mario Solis-Marich

Huffington Post (May 5, 2010)

The fabled Mexican battle at Puebla will be commemorated today although most people celebrating it ont know what they are celebrating. Cinco de Mayo is not as celebrated in Mexico as it is in the US. Cinco de Mayo is in fact a uniquely American celebration about one of its many cultures historical mile stones. The holiday was only big in Puebla until it was big here. A signal that being Latino is as American as a double Patron margarita strained into a large salted martini glass (try it if you haven’t yet).

A sore spot among Latinos has long been that America accepts our cultural best while openly vilifying us in general. Salsa has long replaced ketchup as our country’s favorite condiment. Americans have adopted Cesar salads to the extent that most don’t even know it is a Mexican creation. Suburbanites love the hard work ethic that is embedded in our cultural DNA and that they so readily hire. Tierra, Shakira, Ricky Martin, Eve Longoria, Raquel Welch, Vicky Carr are loved. The man that fixes fences, the trust worthy woman who creates safety and care for children, the boy that bags groceries are sought after. The voter that preserves balance and the politician that consistently votes for education are courted. All of these people are admired…. when needed.

Yet these same people are conflated by the media with drug smugglers and terrorists. The disconnect is painfully irritating and quite frankly politically and socially unsustainable.

No place is this hypocritical disconnect more obvious then in the political arena. The President called on Latino voters recently to help save his Democratic legislative majorities and a few days later seemed to roll over while the broken US Senate decided that climate legislation was to be it’s sole next priority. In the US Senate races the dissonance is dramatically experienced in Colorado as incumbent Democratic Senator Michael Bennet tells Latino activists that he is better on immigration issues than his primary opponent but fails to move aggressively on immigration reform and on condemning the Arizona hate bill. Bennet cannot win without a clear Latino super majority. It seems that in politics as in life Latinos are charged with doing the heavy lifting for little pay back.

The Arizona boycott movement has been a immediate success. People of all races and ethnicities have reacted with their pocket books and are sending Jan Brewer and the GOP led state legislature a strong message. The message has been passionate and clear. While the strength of the boycott movement will undoubtedly have a huge impact on the Arizona market place it provides a warning to the national political arena as well. For now the boycott is limited to Arizona and the market place of goods and services. Both political party’s would be wise to work hard to contain it as such.

While politicians tonight toast Latinos with margaritas as they dip their chips into mild salsa they would be wise to remember that the battle that is being commemorated was one won by an outnumbered and grossly underestimated people determined to maintain their freedoms and independence. A tough lot to beat, just ask the French.

Join Mario at : Boycott the Police State Known as Arizona

Mario Solis-Marich is a radio talk show host who can be heard on AM 760 in Denver and world wide at

www.GoToMario.com. You can find Mario on Facebook.