AZ debate shows low profile of Latino leadership

by NYC Latino Politics on May 10, 2010

This article was circulated by the National Institute Latino Policy (NILP)

By JESSE WASHINGTON

Associated Press (May 7, 2010)

Quick: Name a leader of the national Hispanic community.

That’s not easy for some Hispanics, let alone other Americans. Even as the Arizona immigration debate has highlighted concerns of the nation’s more than 40 million Latino citizens, it has revealed a lack of name-brand recognition for those dedicated to serving America’s largest minority group.

This relative obscurity is largely due to the diversity of Latinos, who come from many countries and cultures with unique concerns that are not easily lumped together – but often are.

“When you’re in Colombia, you’re a Colombian. When you’re in Puerto Rico, you’re a Puerto Rican. When you’re in the U.S., you’re a Latino or Hispanic,” said Eric Cortes, a Philadelphia resident and member of a local leadership institute that trains people to work in the Latino community.

Cortes could not recall the names of any leaders of national Latino organizations, but he knew many locally based activists.

“I feel like every state or region has that person doing national campaigns for rights. … It’s hard to pinpoint one person,” he said.

There are, in fact, many Latino leaders with national impact. Yet in the Arizona debate they have been overshadowed by the Rev. Al Sharpton, who led a march in Phoenix on Wednesday, debated pro-immigration sheriff Joe Arpaio on television and made numerous other appearances and statements.

Several Latino leaders said it’s better to have multiple leaders and groups who can focus on different areas.

“The political sector, the civil rights sector, the business sector, small business, immigrants’ rights, organized labor,” said Thomas Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund. “I don’t know if this is a community that can or ought to depend on a single or very small group of leaders.”

MALDEF was founded in 1968 to focus on legal activism. It was born from the League of United Latin American Citizens, or LULAC, the nation’s oldest Latino rights group, which was founded in 1929.

Another major organization is the National Council of La Raza, known as NCLR. On Thursday, it gathered seven other organizations at its headquarters to call for a national boycott of Arizona over the new law requiring police to question people’s immigration status, which many Latinos say encourages racial profiling.

“I worry less about emerging as a singular leader than thinking about what work can I do in the community,” said Janet Murguia, NCLR’s president and CEO. “When you’re in a movement to create change, you don’t do that without leaders across the board.”

Hispanic organizations have helped millions of citizens – desegregating schools and other public places, helping create the Head Start program, pushing for the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. Yet people like Murguia, Saenz and Brent Wilkes, LULAC’s national executive director, remain unknown to many.

Wilkes sees several reasons. “The African-American civil rights movement, because of slavery, was more dramatic. While there are parallels to some issues, Latinos didn’t face perhaps the same level of discrimination.”

Also, Wilkes said, “The culture is different. Latinos are less likely to rally around the one individual. Latinos who get involved prefer to create their own thing, and not necessarily fall in line behind one person.”

“I also think that a lot of this is a media-driven phenomenon,” he said. “If you’re not in the media, I think you get left out of the public consciousness.”

Most civil rights leaders came out of the black church, which has a tradition of public performance and showmanship that continues to draw media attention. The Revs. Jesse Jackson and Sharpton both mastered the art of attracting cameras, which combined with their activism made them famous, although not embraced as leaders by all blacks.

Today, the issue of equality in America is largely seen in a black-and-white framework, while Latino issues are not covered as much. Aside from immigration, it has been years since a Hispanic issue penetrated the national discourse, like Cesar Chavez’s farm union work starting in the 1960s or California’s Proposition 187 effort in 1994 to prevent non-citizens from receiving social services.

“The Latino community does not lack for leaders,” said O. Ricardo Pimentel, president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists and the editorial page editor at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. “It’s as rich in leaders as any other community. But the exposure those leaders get is different. It’s a function of where the cameras are pointing.”

This dynamic could be changing as the looming immigration reform battle gives Latino leaders a new platform and a galvanizing issue to unite people of all backgrounds.

NCLR’s Murguia said her group is trying to garner more media coverage, and that the Arizona law “becomes an opportunity to get a clear message out.”

“You’re not wishing for disaster so you can find the opportunity,” she said. “But we will seize this situation to act in the best interests of our community. I hope that we will be able to leverage media more as we reinforce the impact of this law and the message that we want to convey.”

Jesse Washington covers race and ethnicity for The Associated Press.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Happy Cinco de Boycott!

by NYC Latino Politics on May 6, 2010

Thought we share this with our readers:

By Mario Solis-Marich

Huffington Post (May 5, 2010)

The fabled Mexican battle at Puebla will be commemorated today although most people celebrating it ont know what they are celebrating. Cinco de Mayo is not as celebrated in Mexico as it is in the US. Cinco de Mayo is in fact a uniquely American celebration about one of its many cultures historical mile stones. The holiday was only big in Puebla until it was big here. A signal that being Latino is as American as a double Patron margarita strained into a large salted martini glass (try it if you haven’t yet).

A sore spot among Latinos has long been that America accepts our cultural best while openly vilifying us in general. Salsa has long replaced ketchup as our country’s favorite condiment. Americans have adopted Cesar salads to the extent that most don’t even know it is a Mexican creation. Suburbanites love the hard work ethic that is embedded in our cultural DNA and that they so readily hire. Tierra, Shakira, Ricky Martin, Eve Longoria, Raquel Welch, Vicky Carr are loved. The man that fixes fences, the trust worthy woman who creates safety and care for children, the boy that bags groceries are sought after. The voter that preserves balance and the politician that consistently votes for education are courted. All of these people are admired…. when needed.

Yet these same people are conflated by the media with drug smugglers and terrorists. The disconnect is painfully irritating and quite frankly politically and socially unsustainable.

No place is this hypocritical disconnect more obvious then in the political arena. The President called on Latino voters recently to help save his Democratic legislative majorities and a few days later seemed to roll over while the broken US Senate decided that climate legislation was to be it’s sole next priority. In the US Senate races the dissonance is dramatically experienced in Colorado as incumbent Democratic Senator Michael Bennet tells Latino activists that he is better on immigration issues than his primary opponent but fails to move aggressively on immigration reform and on condemning the Arizona hate bill. Bennet cannot win without a clear Latino super majority. It seems that in politics as in life Latinos are charged with doing the heavy lifting for little pay back.

The Arizona boycott movement has been a immediate success. People of all races and ethnicities have reacted with their pocket books and are sending Jan Brewer and the GOP led state legislature a strong message. The message has been passionate and clear. While the strength of the boycott movement will undoubtedly have a huge impact on the Arizona market place it provides a warning to the national political arena as well. For now the boycott is limited to Arizona and the market place of goods and services. Both political party’s would be wise to work hard to contain it as such.

While politicians tonight toast Latinos with margaritas as they dip their chips into mild salsa they would be wise to remember that the battle that is being commemorated was one won by an outnumbered and grossly underestimated people determined to maintain their freedoms and independence. A tough lot to beat, just ask the French.

Join Mario at : Boycott the Police State Known as Arizona

Mario Solis-Marich is a radio talk show host who can be heard on AM 760 in Denver and world wide at

www.GoToMario.com. You can find Mario on Facebook.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

What the Statehood Folks Would Want

by Julio Pabon on April 29, 2010

I recently read this article and I like to read everything from all sectors because I have always learned: “Para que no me cuenten.” I thought I would like to share it with many of my readers. It is Mr. Fortuños plea to congress for Puerto Rico’s statehood. For those of us who don’t agree with the folks from the statehood party, it is always interesting to know their positions. Read on and comment:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jaime-fortuno/will-congress-tell-puerto_b_553544.html

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Bronx Politician, Pedro Espada Faces Another Investigation

by NYC Latino Politics on April 29, 2010

ATTORNEY GENERAL CUOMO SUES PEDRO ESPADA, JR. AND PEDRO G. ESPADA FOR FRAUDULENT AND ABUSIVE LABOR PRACTICES

Espadas Created a Sham Job Training Program to Cheat Workers, Maximize
Profits, and Shortchange Taxpayers

NEW YORK, NY (April 28, 2010) – Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo today
filed a lawsuit against Senate Majority Leader Pedro Espada, Jr. and his
son, Pedro G. Espada, for violating labor laws by creating a sham job
training program that cheated workers and shortchanged State coffers.

The lawsuit alleges that Senator Espada created a personally owned,
for-profit management company, Espada Management, as a vehicle to siphon
money from Comprehensive Community Development Corporation
(“Soundview”), the Bronx-based not-for-profit where Espada is
founder and CEO. The money flowed from Soundview to Espada Management,
run by Pedro G. Espada, by means of a contractual arrangement that
called for Espada Management to supply janitors for the Soundview
medical clinics.

The lawsuit alleges that Senator Pedro Espada, Jr. and Pedro G. Espada
devised and operated a sham job training program to minimize costs and
maximize profits at Espada Management. The program mischaracterized
workers as trainees who were then paid wages that were far below what
New York State law requires. The trainees typically worked for a two
week period with little training or direction and performed tasks such
as cleaning bathrooms, mopping floors, and sweeping – the same tasks a
full-time janitor performed. During the program, the workers were paid
a fraction of the wages mandated by law, some making less than $70 per
week, or the equivalent of under $1.70 per hour. Paychecks were signed
by either Senator Espada or his son.

“This was a sham job training program pure and simple with workers
receiving no training and getting virtually no jobs,” said Attorney
General Cuomo. “Espada ripped off his own community in order to
maximize the amount of money he could siphon out of the Soundview
clinic, according to our Complaint. The Espada business model at
Soundview appears to have been based on lies and deceit, abusing
hardworking people for profit and cheating the state out of tax
dollars.”

The lawsuit alleges that the workers were lured into the program with
false promises of potential jobs and job training, but in the end, most
were just replaced by other trainees, also making below minimum wage.
Since 2005, at least 100 workers have been victimized by this program.

At the end of the program, trainees received a “Certificate of
Completion of Healthcare Maintenance Internship.” The certificates
were signed by Pedro G. Espada and were “for Fulfillment of JCAHO
standards maintenance training program.” The lawsuit alleges that
these certificates are worthless and misleading. The initials
“JCAHO” on the certificate stand for the “Joint Commission
on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.” That organization knew
nothing of the Espadas’ program, did not authorize its name to any
such program, did not provide or publish standards for janitorial
services that might be the subject of a training program, and has no
curriculum whatsoever that would support such a program.

The lawsuit also alleges that permanent employees of the janitorial
company were not paid proper overtime wages, and, in some cases, were
not paid for any of the overtime hours that they worked.

The Attorney General’s lawsuit alleges the Espadas have not only
cheated employees, but have short-changed New York State as well.
According to the lawsuit:

● No pay stubs existed.
● No state unemployment taxes were paid.
● No tax deductions were made as required by law.
● Workers’ Compensation coverage was not obtained.

The lawsuit seeks, among other things, to:
● Order the defendants to pay restitution and damages for unpaid
wages.
● Award interest as allowed by law.
● Order Defendants to implement new policies to prevent abuse of
workers.
● End the janitorial training program.

Senator Espada founded Espada Management in 2007. Pedro G. Espada, who
is also an employee of Soundview, was put in charge of the company when
it began operations in 2008. A bidding process was then rigged to
ensure that Soundview would award Espada Management with a contract to
perform janitorial work. That contract is worth almost $400,000
annually. In 2008, Pedro G. Espada earned more than $150,000 from
Espada Management and from Soundview.

The civil lawsuit was filed today in the Supreme Court of the State of
New York, New York County. The civil lawsuit alleges the defendants
violated Sections 195, 652, and 661 of New York State Labor Law by
willfully failing to pay minimum wages and failing to maintain proper
employment records. The lawsuit also alleges the all the defendants
violated Sections 142-2.2, 142-2.4 and 142.2-of the New York Codes,
Rules, and Regulations. Finally, the lawsuit also alleges that the
conduct at issue represented a persistent and repeated illegality in
violation of NY Executive Law Section 63(12).

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Last week, Attorney General Cuomo filed a lawsuit filed against Senator
Espada for diverting Soundview’s charitable assets and using the money
for himself, his family, his friends, and his political operation.
Nineteen current and former officers and directors of Soundview are also
named in the lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges that in the past five years,
Senator Espada has siphoned more than $14 million out of Soundview,
including an unconditionally guaranteed severance package worth an
estimated $9 million that was put into a contract signed in 2005. The
lawsuit seeks to permanently remove Senator Espada and current CFO
Kenneth Brennan as officers of Soundview and, similarly, to remove all
of Soundview’s directors from the Board. The lawsuit also seeks
restitution from Senator Espada.

Also last week, the Attorney General served the New York State Senate
with a subpoena calling for the production of records related to ten
Senate employees who also served on the board or were employed or
retained by Soundview or its affiliated companies. The subpoenas seek
records pertaining to application and hiring, time and attendance, as
well as travel and expenses for the Senate personnel.

Additionally, last week investigators from the Attorney General’s
office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Internal Revenue
Service executed a search warrant on Soundview as part of an ongoing
criminal probe.

The lawsuit is available at www.ag.ny.gov.

The investigations into Senator Espada and Soundview are ongoing.

This case is being handled by Assistant Attorney General Nathan Reilly,
Assistant Attorney General Mina Kim, and Chief of the Labor Bureau
Patricia Kakalec.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Bringing Political Change To The Bronx

by NYC Latino Politics on April 27, 2010

Contact: Miguel Santana at sssantana@optonline.net.

WHY WE ARE…

The impetus in creating Bronx for Change stems from a growing chorus of disaffection regarding our public services, political representation and practices throughout our beloved borough, thus arresting the development of the electorate. As such, Bronx for Change is led by Bronxites unwilling to be indifferent to this REALITY.

PURPOSE STATEMENT…

Our purpose is to: develop future leaders, fill voids and address issues. We aim to awaken our waning democratic participation by empowering fellow Bronxites and sharing knowledge based on: what it takes to organize campaigns; discuss issues that adversely affect our livelihoods, communities and its’ impact on public policies through workshops, seminars and forums.

It is our responsibility, then, to go beyond the call of duty by offering alternatives to the status quo. We believe in the will of the people and the collective might to secure a better life in The Bronx.

What we think, how we care and the way we fight is significant to our cause. This is why we invite you to be an active member and contributor by joining the Bronx for Change movement! People – when united in large numbers – can effect the change desired. That change starts with your hearts and minds.

When we organize, when we get involved, when we stand up and when we speak out, we create a power that no one can suppress or marginalize.

VISION…

Our Vision is to Empower the Powerless, Inspire the Voiceless and Initiate Social, Economic and Political Justice for All!

We pledge to:

* Effect positive change through volunteer action: big or small
* Make a difference in the lives of children, adults and the elderly
* Recognize and honor commitment to service
* Give of oneself to empower the giver and the recipient
* Engage the youth to help shape our community’s future

GRASSROOTS TRAINING FOR “BRONXITES”…

* Do You Feel Your Community’s Needs Are Not Being Met?
* Do You Feel the Need for New Leadership in Bronx County?
* Are You or Anyone You Know Interested in Running for Public Office?
* Ran Once and Need More Ideas?
* Want to Help Someone Win?

If you answered YES to any of the above questions, then invite us to train you and your organization on “How to Break into Politics.”

BENEFITS OF TRAINING…

This basic training will combine experienced trainers, stimulating exercises, case studies and interactive simulations. We are counting on YOU to organize around issues that matter, help build capacity in your community and encourage like-minded leaders to get
involved.

* Leaders will gain awareness and knowledge
* Leaders will learn valuable team building skills
* Leaders will know how to organize basic trainings

Again, if you or your organization would like to learn how to break into politics, then feel free to email us at BronxForChange@gmail.com to arrange a training session.

A CALL TO ACTION…

We ask that you share your creative vision to further develop Bronx for Change. Help us shape this group and agenda.

Your Ideas, Your Bronx!

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Guilty Verdict in Long Island Race Killing

by NYC Latino Politics on April 19, 2010

This case was being followed by many Latino immigration activist as well as many in the community as a meter of anti-immigrant hate crimes that have been growing throughout the country. The fact that the jury came back with a “guilty” sentence is a relief, however, the fact that they did not find the attacker guilty of 2nd degree murder is telling as well. Read and be aware that America, “Land of the Free” is slowly becoming the “land of anti-immigrant sentiments” that need to be addressed. If you are Puerto Rican, or Chicano, or any Latino born in this country you might believe that this does not apply to. We urge you to re-think and beware. Ignorant, vigilante hate groups don’t go around asking information, they just react out of fear that transform itself into a vicious violence against a color, a spoken Spanish word, or a way of dress. Therefore, get involved and help fight against this anti-immigrant sentiment.

By Manny Fernandez

New York Times (April 19, 2010)

RIVERHEAD, N.Y. – The Long Island teenager accused of stabbing and killing an Ecuadorean immigrant in a racially motivated attack was convicted on Monday of manslaughter as a hate crime, a less serious crime than the initial murder charge – saving him from spending the rest of his life behind bars.

Seventeen months after the stabbing in 2008 and 24 miles from the parking lot in Patchogue where the victim left a 370-foot trail of blood, the jury forewoman rose in State Supreme Court here to read the verdict, ending four days of deliberations. The teenager, Jeffrey Conroy, was found guilty of first-degree manslaughter as a hate crime in connection with the death of the immigrant, Marcelo Lucero, and guilty of attempted assaults on three other Hispanic men. He was acquitted of the most serious of the 20 charges against him, second-degree murder as a hate crime.

On the manslaughter charge alone, Mr. Conroy, 19, faces a minimum of eight years and a maximum of 25 years when he is sentenced on May 26. As the verdict was read, the courtroom was virtually silent. When Mr. Conroy sat down, he bowed his head for a few moments.

Mr. Lucero’s death had become a symbol of the anti-Hispanic harassment and assaults that Latinos on eastern Long Island said they had been victims of for years, and it helped spark an ongoing federal investigation into the Suffolk County Police Department’s handling of reports of racially-motivated attacks against Hispanics. The Lucero family and their supporters, including a representative of the Ecuadorean government’s National Department of the Migrants, had expressed confidence in recent days that the prosecution had indeed proven that Mr. Conroy was guilty of murder.

The verdict came 11 days after Mr. Conroy took the stand to proclaim his innocence and blame the stabbing on another teenager, the most dramatic and puzzling moment in a trial that began nearly seven weeks ago with jury selection on March 2. Mr. Conroy said that moments after the stabbing, the other teenager, Christopher Overton, told him that he was the one who stabbed Mr. Lucero and had asked him to take the knife.

At the time, Mr. Overton was out on bail awaiting sentencing on a felony conviction for a 2007 home-invasion burglary in which the homeowner was shot and killed. Mr. Conroy said Mr. Overton told him, “I’ll be screwed if I get caught.”

Mr. Conroy testified that his five-page written confession to the police, in which he admitted stabbing Mr. Lucero as part of an attack he carried out with six friends, was a lie. He said in court that he lied to protect Mr. Overton, whom he had met for the first time earlier that evening, and because he did not realize at the time he was being questioned by the police that Mr. Lucero had died.

The 12-member jury was made up of seven men and five women. One was black, one was Hispanic and the rest were white.

The jury’s manslaughter verdict meant that they had agreed with one of the arguments made by Mr. Conroy’s lawyer – that his client did not intend to kill Mr. Lucero – and discounted the prosecution’s allegation that Mr. Conroy stabbed him in the chest seeking not to injure but to kill. To convict Mr. Conroy of second-degree murder, the jury had to have found that he intended to kill Mr. Lucero, and to convict on first-degree manslaughter, they needed to find that Mr. Conroy caused Mr. Lucero’s death while intending to cause only serious physical injury, not death.

Mr. Lucero was stabbed once in the chest, and the knife did not penetrate the chest cavity, did not strike any major organs and ran parallel to the skin, cutting his right axillary artery and an adjacent large vein.

In his closing argument, Mr. Conroy’s lawyer, William Keahon, told the jury that if Mr. Conroy had intended to kill Mr. Lucero, then there should have been multiple stab wounds, and Mr. Lucero would not have been allowed to walk away as the altercation ended, as he did, though the lead detective in the case described it earlier in the trial not as walking but as staggering away. In her summation, the Suffolk County assistant district attorney prosecuting the case, Megan O’Donnell, said that Mr. Conroy’s intent to kill was evident, because the entire blade went into Mr. Lucero’s chest area and was stopped only by the handle, and because the knife went in, came partially out and went back in, in two separate thrusts.

Prosecutors said Mr. Lucero, a 37-year-old worker at a dry cleaning shop from Gualaceo, Ecuador, was surrounded and attacked by Mr. Conroy and six other teenagers in a parking lot of the Long Island Rail Road train station in Patchogue shortly before midnight on Nov. 8, 2008. Mr. Lucero and his friend were walking to another friend’s house. Mr. Conroy and his six friends were out walking, too, on the hunt, prosecutors said, for Hispanic men to beat up, a frequent activity that they referred to as “Mexican hopping” and “beaner hopping.”

Mr. Lucero took off his belt and began swinging it after one of the seven teenagers punched him in the face. Mr. Conroy said in his written statement to the police that the belt struck him on the head, and, as Ms. O’Donnell said, Mr. Conroy lunged at Mr. Lucero with a knife because he was angry and because Mr. Lucero had the audacity to fight back. Mr. Lucero died of a stab wound to the chest about an hour later.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Grandson, Nephew of Bronx Politicians Pleaded Guilty to Embezzlement of SBCC

by Alfonzo Beal on April 14, 2010

Carmen ArroyoRichard Izquierdo-ArroyoView Comments

Non-profit looters, Richard Izquierdo-Arroyo and Margarita Villegas

By Alicia Cruz
The Black Urban Times

The grandson of Assemblywoman Carmen Arroyo (D-Bronx) pleaded guilty in Manhattan Federal Court Friday to one count of embezzlement after admitting he embezzled $115,000 from a taxpayer-funded nonprofit to finance his life of lavish and make campaign donations to his grandmother.

The city’s Department of Investigation and federal prosecutors delved into the expenditures of Richard Izquierdo-Arroyo and found that he charged $15,000 worth of clothes and shoes from Tommy Hilfiger, Coach and Polo Ralph Lauren to the group’s American Express credit card.

There were $66,000 spent on meals at Tavern on the Green and another upscale steakhouse and $48,000 on hotels and airfare for fancy Caribbean vacations.

Izquierdo-Arroyo, 33, was the president of South Bronx Community Corporation (SBCC), which used taxpayer funds to run low-income apartments in the Bronx. The organization received millions of dollars in federal housing funds in addition to the city funds it received.

Arroyo admitted that one of his extravagant purchases included having new flooring put down in his grandmother’s district office as well as hiring interns for his aunt, Bronx Councilwoman Maria del Carmen Arroyo (pictured below).


Margarita Villegas, director of SBCC, pleaded guilty earlier this month to one count of embezzlement for robbing the SBCC Management Corp of at least $50,000 and is facing 10 to 16 months, but Manhattan Federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein could sentence her to up to 10 years.

Michael Rosen, attorney for Villegas, told the New York Daily News that his client was not enjoying the high life. “She didn’t go to Bergdorf’s, Bendel’s or Saks,” said Rosen. “She went to Dress Barn.”

Arroyo is facing 10 to 12 months in prison when he is sentenced in June.

So far, neither of the Bronx politicians have been charged with any crimes associated with Arroyo’s embezzlement scam.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Grassroots, civic engagement training group set to ignite a movement.

by NYC Latino Politics on April 13, 2010



by: Miguel Santana

Dismayed with the state of Bronx politics, due to the resulting economic and social conditions of their community, several outstanding Bronx leaders have formed a civic-engagement group appropriately named in the style of the Obama “change” motif, Bronx for Change (BFC).

In honor of Abraham Lincoln’s theme,” Government of the People; By the People; For the People,” BFC has committed itself to strengthening grassroots organizations and individual Bronxite participation in social movement-building via pro-active political participation.

BFC’s vision is to, Empower the Powerless, Inspire the Voiceless and Initiate Social, Economic and Political Justice for All!

BFC’s mission is to address any issue that would hamper the development of future leaders by filling leadership voids.

BFC aims to awaken political participation and thus begin to curtail the widespread, waning democratic elector participation which hinders economic and social policy development in the Bronx.

We accomplish this by empowering fellow Bronxites through sharing our collective knowledge-based on what it takes to change public policies that have an adverse affect on our livelihoods, our families, friends and communities and also by sharing information and support on how to organize winning campaigns that result in the election of responsive leaders.

BFC ultimately believes in the will of the people and our collective might to secure a better life for ourselves, our children, and our fellow man.

What we think, how we care and the way we fight is significant to our cause. Even humble and dispossessed people, when united in significant numbers, can and do effect the desired change. That change starts within our hearts and minds when we organize, when we get involved, when we stand up and when we speak out we create a collective power that no one can suppress or marginalize.

Facilitator Priscilla Nibbs-Bracy stated: “We believe that an informed electorate will mean more accountable, transparent and responsive elected officials.”

Co-Founder Carlos “Charlie” Ramos stated: “We simply equip ordinary people with the tools to mobilize around issues so that they may empower themselves and hone their leadership skills.”

Facilitator Nichole Singleton stated: “There is power in the people as long as we understand that United We Stand, Divided We Fall!”

Co-Founder Ephraim Cruz stated: “True democracy is about meeting people where they are to effect change.”

Facilitator Sara Izzard stated: “This movement is about creating a culture of access and inclusion.”

Co-Founder Miguel Santana stated: “We are developing a powerful cadre of fully engaged Bronxites with the skills-set to be active participants in the decision making process.”

Sociologist William Cameron wrote, “The essence of a social movement is change. The main characteristic of a social movement is that it seeks to change the culture or change the social structure or redistribute the power of control within a society.”

BFC seeks to serve as a catalyst for change by offering, free of charge, community empowerment workshops, seminars and open discussion forums in:

• Coalition and community advocacy
• Grassroots capacity-building
• Campaign and candidate training

To join the Bronx for Change movement, schedule or attend upcoming training sessions organizations and individuals can email: info@BronxForChange.org or add Bronx for Change as a friend on Facebook.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

East Harlem Councilwomen Melissa Viverito On Track With Issues

by Julio Pabon on February 8, 2010

Refreshing to see a Puerto Rican elected official “on target with the community”

Melissa hopes to move these forward during this term. There are also many more bills and resolutions to be introduced in the coming weeks and months. Here is the list of legislation introduced by Melissa yesterday:

[click to continue...]

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

South Bronx Community Is Organizing

by Alfonzo Beal on January 24, 2010

South Bronx: Over 15 community organizations doing work in the South Bronx and several individuals representing themselves met at La Resurrección United Methodist Church located at 158th Street and Elton Avenue to form a broad based organization that can unite on common issues and defend the rights of the South Bronx community.

The organizations forming part of this historic organization range from housing advocacy groups like Pueblo En Marcha, Nos Quedamos and some Tenant Organizations to community gardens, to broad based coalitions like 4 The South Bronx Coalition fighting to make the NY Yankees accountable to their promises.

“This is the first time that I have seen in the last 35 years that we have the opportunity to unite in a broad based way and unite on issues that affect all of us,” stated Maximino Rivera, Chairman of Pueblo En Marcha and one of the founders of the movement.

The purpose of the organization is to try and bring as many South Bronx organizations and activist that are interested in uniting in a broad based organization like a Community Congress that would be able to share resources and help promote each other and support each others issues.

The South Bronx is ready for this type of movement, “we don’t intend to duplicate any organizations work, but on the contrary support their work and unite to lend each other the broad based support required to get the attention and respect required to bring effective change,” stated another of the founders, Julio Muñoz.

There is no doubt that the South Bronx is ripe and needs this type of organization, something similar like the Northwest Bronx Clergy & Community Coalition in the upper Bronx that have been quite effective in defending the rights of the organization in that area of the Bronx. This organization is credited for stopping the development of the Kingsbridge Armory Mall something that the community did not want unless the developers guaranteed certain wages and benefits to the community, something that they refused to do, thus the project was stopped.

“If we would have had a similar organization in the South Bronx, the developers who put up the new mall on the site of the old terminal Market by 149th Street and the NY Yankees new stadium would have never been able to take advantage of the community with so many broken promises the way that they did with those sweetheart agreements,” stated Anita Antonetty, another founder and community resident.

The organizers are clear that this has to be an organization that focuses on the South Bronx comprising up Community 1,2 and 4. This area of the Bronx has historically had the distinction of being the poorest congressional district in the country. “Why are we still the poorest community, we have intelligent people, we have people with degrees and people who care about the community?” asked another person present.

The fact is that the South Bronx community has some of the worst statistics facing any urban community in the country, but it also has some of the most corrupt elected officials who have historically put their personal and political ambitions before their constituents. Others have actually been so arrogant as to believe that they are the true leaders instead of an elected “representative” of a community that has many community leaders without any cohesion.

For example other than Councilwoman Helen Foster, there has not been any elected official that has questioned the NY Yankees on the 25% jobs, or 25% contracts that they promised during the construction phase. Though they Yankees have bragged how they met and surpassed those numbers they have never produced any documents, or lists to prove it. However, if you take an informal poll of any part of the community surrounding the stadium and ask anyone if they have worked, or knew of any or their neighbors that received any job, or contract from the Yankees you would be hard pressed to find anyone that can claim they did, or know of any neighbor that has benefited from the massive $1.3 billion dollar city subsidized project.

Similar allegations and concerns have been raised about the Gateway Mall several blocks south of the old stadium. Nancy Guzman, a resident at Walton Ave and 153rd Street located in between the new stadium and the Mall stated, “it’s like if this community did not exist. These projects get built here. We are inconvenienced by the construction and afterwards by the traffic and all the issues related to the large numbers of people coming through this community. What did we residents get from it? Nothing and where were our so-called elected leaders, no-where?” Every elected official who claims to represent the South Bronx community should hide in shame for allowing this to happen.

Unfortunately some of these elected officials representing the South Bronx are either extremely dysfunctional, opportunist or blind. For example not one elected official has yet to be heard, or question the integrity of any of the community benefits agreements signed by both the Gateway Mall Developers and the NY Yankees. Though most have been quiet on the subject, one has actually had the audacity to state that she saw no problems at all. Councilwomen Maria Del Carmen Arroyo was recently heard to say, “the Yankees have kept all the promises they made, I have no problems with the Yankees.” It’s a shame that an elected official in the South Bronx can be so detached from the very people that they are supposed to represent. If that statement would have been made public prior to the citywide elections and Mickey Mouse would have run against Arroyo just promoting what she was heard to say, Ms. Arroyo would be collecting unemployment today.

Despite the poverty and problems and lack of true elected leadership in the South Bronx, the news of so many community activists coming together is a sign of positive things to come. If this effort to unite and create a South Bronx Congress can be achieved, the South Bronx will finally begin to come up from the shadows and despair of the many who have knowingly taken advantage of this community and perhaps like the Jewish community the South Bronx can say: “Never Again!”

The next meeting of the organization will take place on Feb 13th at 12:30 to 3:30pm at the Resurrección United Methodist Church located on 158th St and Elton Ave.
For more information call 718-993-0909

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

The NYC Latino Politics Website is not responsible for content from external sites. The comments and opinions throughout this website belong to their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NYC Latino Politics website.